After almost 24 hours to process just what the hell happened yesterday in Yerba Bueno I decided to give my two cents on the Apple iPad.

First, a small disclaimer. I own a MacBook, which took about the last two years to convince myself to purchase. I have a realistic look at Apple; I am by no means an “iFanboy” so, I will try to do my best in giving a fair and honest assessment. Oh, and by the way, I will mix in some of my opinion because that’s what I know the best.

The name iPad = overall fail

Ok. The name isn’t too bad, but if only after an hour of being announced something is being made fun of on Twitter and around the web (iTampon?) the name may not be the greatest. I felt the same way when the Wii was announced, so in time it may be OK. All connotations aside iPad sounds like iPod with a terrible Jersey accent. It wasn’t the greatest part of the God Tablet.

Input

As of right now we know of two ways to input on the iPad. One is the virtual keyboard. The second is the optional keyboard dock.

When I first saw the huge virtual keyboard enabled on a picture at Engadget, I thought to myself, “How in the hell am I going to use that?” The keyboard seems too big and typing with one finger at a time is not efficient at all. I see how one could place it on their lap and then type “regularly” on the virtual keyboard. To be honest I don’t see this as being comfortable at all.

The keyboard dock is cool, but why in portrait mode? I’d say that Steve SEVERALLY screwed this part up. What laptop or computer do you know of that has the screen sitting in portrait mode? None at all. Sometimes being different for the sake of being different isn’t “creative,” it is just trying to be different. What if I want to watch a quick video while docked? Now I have to watch it in a smaller size because I don’t have the width in portrait to view it.

Hardware

You can check out the specs here for the iPad. The screen seems large enough and from reports is “beautiful.” The unibody design is attractive. The Apple A4 chip is their own silicon and makes me wonder how far that will go (maybe into newer MacBooks). WiFi or 3G will be included. No camera.

To be honest I wasn’t shocked or too impressed by the hardware. It’s pretty and I am sure is made of high quality components. But really it’s just a large iPod Touch with 3G capabilities.

Content

The iPad’s iTunes integration looks very good. I am sure that the experience will be excellent. Not enough for me to drop the money on it though. I have a MacBook that can do the same media functions as the iPad, plus everything else I would ever need. Consuming media on this device is something that most consumers will probably do, I guess, but I think that having laptops that are around the same price will serve most consumers better.

eBooks

Here is where Apple could have made a huge difference; they could have thought of new innovative ways for students and professionals to use textbooks and manuals and created a new way of interacting with them. But they didn’t.

Did I miss something yesterday? Is there no way to annotate any type of notes on the iPad. A text book being displayed on a nice crystal-clear 9.7″ screen is useless to me if I can’t take any notes on it! Showing me a few “slick” animations when you are turning a page on your virtual book is really just a smoke screen blocking that they have missed the mark on the proper way to read and use digital books on a device. How sad.

I was assured that Apple was going to revolutionize the idea of eBooks. What they did was just follow the crowd which is not a normal stance for Jobs and Company.

Conclusion

The iPad is underwhelming. And because of that, there are a couple of larger points to make about mobile technology, the tech industry, and the tech media.

The tech media is crazy and it is truly out of control. I couldn’t believe how many bloggers and industry “experts” got most aspects of the iPad wrong. There were rumor after rumor after rumor on this damn tablet and most were incorrect. It is almost embarrassing. I understand that the media gives the people what they want to hear, but the impression that has been made to me is that the tech media just reports anything that they think may be true. It’s upsetting, and because of that I will try hard not to fall into that pit with all the rest.

Because of the push from the media I feel that Apple was almost forced to release this product. Jobs has been quoted saying that he didn’t think eBooks would succeed because no one reads anymore. I understand that he got the whole “no one wants video on their iPod” argument wrong, but after the presentation yesterday I got a sneaking suspicion that this device was forced from Apple. I don’t think that Jobs truly believes that it is as magical as he says it is. Therefore it’s hard for this cynical guy to get excited about it.

We’ll see where the iPad goes from here. As of right now though I’d say that the iPad will be for a select few gadget hungry, Apple loving folks that do not include myself.

Two things today that caught my fancy with our favorite little robot; Android.

ColorWare

First, the company ColorWare is offering the service to give your Nexus One a new paint job. It’s only available in the US and costs $175 and a good, long three weeks away from your beloved, but you aren’t getting 3G coverage so it doesn’t really matter, right? Or, you can buy a brand spanking new unlocked Nexus One with colors of your choice for a hefty $800. All you need is a larger obsession for Android than me plus the $800 smack-a-smoli. Now all ColorWare needs to do is offer this service for my Droid.

You know, for $175 or $800 I would be so afraid of picking the right colors. I change my mind ALOT and being stuck with the same colors might make me regret it.

FunMail

A cool app for Android was released yesterday: FunMail. In a nutshell FunMail allows you to write out a text message and apply the text to a “relevant” picture. You can then send it to anyone who can receive picture mail or even email it.

Some of the choices of “relevant” pictures are spot on, and well, some are not. You can get kind of creative with what you want to say with your message and picture or just leave a lot up for interpretation. Or you can be completely inappropriate. It’s a lot of fun.

A couple of things about FunMail I don’t like is that there is a link on the bottom of the picture. I know that they have to get the word out, but maybe offer a cheap paid version that removes the link at the bottom. Next, you have to register by text message for the service. Seems like a little much for something that doesn’t do a lot and that may only be used a handful of times.

These two should satisfy the cheap-o and the baller out there.

Credits: Engadget, Techcrunch

The FCC sent some letters to all the US mobile phone carriers today (Verizon, AT&T, T-Mob, and Sprint) including Google which asked them to explain how they make the early termination information known to consumers. They believe that consumers are confused about ETFs, especially because they are different at every provider.

Well, thanks FCC for inquiring on something that seems fishy, but do most consumers even care about ETF?

I say no. Unless they are an obsessed type of gadget hound like myself that needs to have the latest greatest device that is available. Other than that, most consumers I imagine don’t even know what the ETF is or when most carrier’s ETFs increase. Here is what the FCC thinks about all of this:

The absence of a standard framework makes it especially important that consumers have a clear understanding of terms and practices of individual companies, which will allow them to compare services offered by different providers on a clear and consistent basis

Once again, I say it doesn’t really matter to standard consumers. They will make the choice of a new device based on it’s price, features, and service, not the possible early termination fees. If consumers are worried about ETFs then they will buy unlocked or used phones on eBay or from other consumers and activate them without contract. Either that or they will go with a service like Boost or Virgin (both sub-par from my experience).

One more thing. If someone buys a new device from any of the four largest US carriers they still have to pay full price for any of the plans that go with the phone. I thought that these phones were subsidized? If so, when someone buys a brand new device they shouldn’t have to pay as much for service.

So, do early termination fees really matter? Or is the FCC just trying to become another consumer watchdog that wants consumers to think that they are doing something important?

PCWorld and many others have been reporting for the last couple of days about the rumor that Apple will end it’s iPhone exclusivity on Wednesday along with the announcement of their new tablet. This has been coming for a while; I am actually surprised that it has taken Apple this long to break out of their agreements.

Release the hounds

When the iPhone is opened up to other carriers we will soon see the real test of networks other than AT&T. I personally think that a network like Verizon could handle the network load, but without some real world testing it remains to be seen. It will be interesting to see how these other US carriers handle the iPhone epidemic that is approaching.

New Networks, New iPhones

So, with the end of exclusivity one has to consider that a new and improved iPhone will be released. I highly doubt Apple will end their agreement only to go to T-Mobile; if they want to take over they will have to create a CDMA version that will work on Verizon that also may have the newer LTE technology as well (when Verizon moves to LTE). I HIGHLY doubt that Apple and Verizon would release a strictly LTE based phone until possibly next year. Just because LTE is being tested in the US, doesn’t mean that it is anywhere close to being rolled out.

So, CDMA iPhone? I think so. If Apple wants to truly kill it on Wednesday their “one more thing” will be a CDMA iPhone on Verizon for a summer release. I’d say a revolutionary tablet and a new iPhone on a network that can handle it would be pretty stellar.

Last year continuing into this one, rumors have been flying about an upcoming Apple Tablet.  As this month continues and we get closer to the Apple event on the 27th, bloggers and even the mainstream media are on fire about a gadget that we don’t even know exists.  So many tech commentators are predicting that the Apple Tablet will be announced, while others are still unsure.

So, really how is this announcement going to leave us feeling afterward?

Shock and Awe

The biggest thing that Apple has to contend with is itself. When you release a revolutionary device, and it actually revolutionizes an industry, you have one hell of an act to follow. Most business people, investors, and geeks expect something HUGE on the 27th. We will need something that will shock us and make us believe that we must have the product immediately, no matter the cost.

Too Big to Fail?

I have a small feeling that Apple will announce something completely different than what everyone is talking about and here is part of the reason.

The New York Times reported that the Apple Tablet was basically a done deal and this is what will be announced and demo at this event. Isn’t it funny that the NYT is a company that would LOVE to be able to distribute their overpriced media on something new and fresh, just in time to save their dying industry? Call me paranoid, but there is nothing wrong with a great conspiracy theory.

I digress. If Apple doesn’t announce the tablet or something that is revolutionary, many, many people will be disappointed. It sucks that we have to rely on this one company for the next best thing in consumer tech, but they have set themselves up for it. Really though, with all of this anticipation and the possibility of no delivery, Apple could take a small hit in the stock department, but I have a stronger feeling that they will announce the infamous tablet and make all of us fanboys and girls happy ones.

So, how are we going to feel about this thing? Are we going to run out the day it’s released and buy it with no thought that it may just be a huge iPod Touch? Or are we going to be skeptical this time around?

Today Palm gave a fancy presentation at CES, not only to announce the new Plus series for Verizon but also to showcase some awesome new features such as pure 3D gaming, video recording and editing, and new services and tools for developers that will may even allow you and I to develop a quick web app for the Pre. After watching Microsoft’s sleepnote last night, Jon Rubinstein and crew gave an amazing presentation that really showcased his company’s strengths. Looks like a little of that Apple keynote juice rubbed off.

Anyways, this new Palm stuff is excellent; they truly have upped the anti and may even make me a little jealous of the new Pre coming to Verizon. But really, with all of the crazy, wild Android rage at CES this year, does webOS have enough gas to make it this year? Some were speculating in 2010 prediction shows that Palm may not make it this year; that they may actually crumble. Yet after this presentation and bundle of announcements, this tech guy think that they will make it.

Too enticing to fail

If nothing else, here is the reason that Palm will make it: being developer friendly. Having video taking and editing, being on a good network, and 3D gaming is important, but as we have seen all last year and what we will continue to see this year is that app stores are what is important. The only way to have excellent app stores is to entice excellent developers. With Palm opening up hardware utilization with code they are trying to open the flood gates for developers. It has also been said by many developers how much more superior the development tools for webOS are in comparison to Android and even iPhone. That coupled with a more open platform than the iPhone, Palm is trying hard to entice users and developers while creating good will.

I believe that Palm will make it this year and I also believe that they are creating a great platform for developers that other companies would kill for. The question now is, with so many Android and webOS devices headed to multiple carriers, which phone and platform to choose?

After watching the TED talk on SixthSense for the 10th and reading this post on jkontherun, I noticed something that needs to happen very soon with mobile technology. Mobile tech needs to be easier to use, make our lives easier, productive, enjoyable, and work how we work.

We shouldn’t have to “get used” to the way a device works; it should be intuitive and be able to be used the way that we want to use it. I like the idea of augmented reality and the way that we can use something like that in work and play. The SixthSense idea seems to be the closest thing that we have to Minority Report technology (not the crazy, creeper procogs, but the awesome tech that makes you want to be Tom Cruise for just a second. Just a second). It is awesome to be able to take something from the real world and put it to the digital world and vice versa and this seems to be the correct move for mobile tech.

CES is going on right now, actually as I speak the Microsoft keynote is streaming, and so much mobile tech is going to be unveiled for release this year. E-readers and tablets are cool, powerful smartphones are neat too, but I still feel like we have a long way to go where our lives aren’t being bogged down by a crappy mobile experience.

Something like SixthSense is the answer. Can you imagine wearing a small pin on your shirt or jacket and having all the functionality that SixthSense portrays? That is an intuitive way to work and play. So, we’ll keep watching CES this week and see what type of Mobile experiences are going to be offered. At the end of the week I’ll have a summary of what seems to be the most important mobile tech of the year, but I guarantee it will not be some crazy cool Minority Report tech.

If you haven’t been on the interwebs and tech blogs in the last six months, you may have missed the passion (or obsession) with the idea of the Apple Tablet and what that piece of technology will look like. If you have been reading all of the blogs you may have become extremely annoyed by the idea that people are talking about a product that doesn’t even exist. Even though “people close to the matter” have “said” that an Apple tablet is completely real, we have no idea what it is going to be like. Since we don’t know it seems natural to ask the question; what do we really need in a tablet?

First, I am just going to make a quick list of my needs and wants in a tablet device:

• At least a 10′, capacitive touchscreen that has the ability to be written on with a stylus
• It would be nice to have a dual screen like the Microsoft Courier Prototype or the Entourage eDGe (but sexier)
• lighter than 1 pound
• at least 7 – 10 hours of battery life
• a camera (3MP or greater)
• Wifi and possible 3G integration
• 16GB or more of memory
• able to read any type of text from ebooks to PDFs
• a fast interface (iPhone OS would be OK, but I would really like a modified version of Android)
• good browser based on Webkit
• $500 or below

I’d say that is pretty good. I think that if a tablet comes out that promises and delivers these features it will do relatively well. Something that I see here though is that Apple may not meet these criteria with their tablet, if any of the proposed features of the Apple Tablet are true. One of the big features of my proposed tablet, sub $500 price point, seems cannot be reached by Apple’s premium pricing. So, I may have to wait for a different company to produce the tablet I am looking for (c’mon MS, where’s your Courier at?).

What would a tablet have to have for a non-regrettable purchase? Do we think that Apple will hit the mark? Or are we going to have to wait for another company to rock the lust-worthy tablet?

I have been watching this story unfold in the wings for a couple of weeks now. Mostly because it didn’t seem like anyone knew what the heck they were talking about and I just wanted someone to get to the bottom of it. It wasn’t that I didn’t believe any of the reports, it’s just that something seemed fishy.

According to Wired, it now seems that Google will be having a press conference on January 5th, the day that many a blogger proposed would be the release date of the infamous “Google Phone”, Nexus One. At this press conference we may see what Google is going to do for their plan to market and sell this phone.

The Nexus One may be sold a tad differently than normal US handsets. Rather than being subsidized by a specific carrier, the phone may be sold directly by Google at an unsubsidized price. The phone would then need to be activated on a GSM carrier such as AT&T or T-Mobile. Yet some others are speculating that since Google has a good relationship with T-Mobile, that the Nexus One will be available at a subsidized price through them. This is where the Nexus One doesn’t seem to add up but here is what we know so far.

Killing Industries

If Google decides to release their own phone (it’s actually HTC hardware) they will potentially alienate their partners such as Samsung, LG, HTC, Motorola, Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile. By providing a their own handset at an unsubsidized cost they are essentially taking the middle man completely out of the picture.

What I personally see happening is pure “creative destruction”. Google is trying to change the face of mobile and cloud-based technology; they are releasing a device and just using the cell phone carriers as “data-pipe” for the Android user experience. This means that in the long run Google will try to create and sell (or even give away for free) new devices that run on any network. This could be a nightmare for smartphone manufacturers and even the carriers because as 3G penetration grows and becomes more reliable only cost will matter in the long run when consumers decide what carrier to go with (here that Verizon?).

Contention, you better believe it

As Google’s mobile takeover pans out in the near future, we will see how protective cell phone companies and handset makers are over their fragile businesses. I am sure that if Google keeps moving forward with their mobile takeover (which they will) eventually these companies are going to sue or make their fears known to the US Government where they will have to battle some type of anti-competitive suit.

So, will Google actually release their unsubsidized Nexus One on January 5th to start a mobile takeover of the United State? Probably, yet they are definitely in store to fight some older industries over their disruptive business behavior. These are some exciting times and it will be interesting to see how this pans out in January.

One thing that I have noticed with my new-fangled Android phone is that to find good apps in the Android Market is, well, somewhat a pain. It seems that the Market searching process needs some refinement. So, it’s nice that the second installment of the Android Developer Challenge Winners have been announced. This gives us some new, useful, innovative apps to choose from the growing number of good and crap apps that the Market has to offer. Here are some of the highlights:

• What the Doodle !?
  • “‘WTD!?’ is a real-time online multiplayer game where one player tries to draw out a given phrase and others try to guess it.”
  • Sounds fun. I haven’t had the chance to try it yet.
• WaveSecure
  • “WaveSecure is a complete mobile security solution that protects your device, data and privacy.”
  • Adds some missing functionality to your Android phone like data wiping. Not sure if it has remote wipe, but if it does this could be the app that will bring Android further into the corporate world.
• A World of Photo
  • “Loosely inspired by the traditional “Spin the bottle”, A World of Photo is a casual, geographic worldwide multiplayer online game with a social touch. Players spin their phones and will receive a photo from whomever in the world they pointed to. For best play experience, let the app run in the background.”
  • This app is pretty cool. I have tried it out and it is still definitely in beta. Also, I kind of got a weird pic of some random guy’s hairy knee. Not so cool.
• Solo
  • “Solo is a great, easy to play and feature rich pocket guitar for your phone. A must for all guitar enthusiasts! Features include -Huge chord library with 380+ chords & diagrams -Load/save chord layouts -Play along with music on your phone -Overlay music & lyrics from the internet -Various strum modes, including shake strum”
  • Being a guitar player this app is extremely handy!
• Speed Forge 3D
  • “Speed Forge: Heavy duty hover vehicles, normally used for mining are now seen in illegal races organized in abondoned factories and dark Marsian alleys. The rock crushing explosives once used in these machines now serve a different purpose…”
  • I tried the free version of this app and I have to say that I am pretty impressed by the 3D graphics on my DROID. I  noticed in the comments section of the app that people on the G1 were experiencing very smooth gameplay as well. This shows me that Android CAN BE A GAMING PLATFORM.

Check out the rest of the Android Developer Challenge 2 Winners here. I am excited to see more and more innovative apps for the Android platform. Hopefully ADC3 will produce ever more great applications for Android.